Factorial Validity and Internal Consistency of Persian Version of the Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 among Junior Female Taekwondo Athletes

Authors

Abstract

A valid questionnaire is a precursor to a sound measurement process. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory – 2 (CSAI-2R). A total of 131 female Taekwondo athletes (Mean age =12.37 ± 2.52) from Damghan completed CSAI-2R at competition venues. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to analyze the structure of CSAI-2R; a 1-factor model and a 3-factor model. CFA results revealed adequate model fit of the 3-factor model (X2= 189.52, df =113, P<0.001; PCFI=0.72, ECVI=1.85, RMSEA =0.06, GFI=0.87). A satisfactory level of alpha coefficient for the subscales (α =0.71 for somatic anxiety, 0.62 for cognitive anxiety and 0.74 for self-confidence). In conclusion, the data provide support for the 3-factor structure of CSAI-2R among female Persian taekwondo athletes. Future studies may extend the evidence to different types of validity and reliability in different age groups and gender.

Keywords


  1. Weinberg R., Gould D., 2003. Foundations of sport & exercise psychology (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  2. Matsumoto D., Takeuchi M., Nakajima T., Ida E., 2000. Competition anxiety, self-confidence, personality and competition performance of American elite and non-elite judo athletes. Res J Budo. 32(3), 12-21.
  3. Alonso J., Angermeyer M.C., Bernert S., Bruffaerts R., Brugha T.S., 2004. Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 21ââ‚‌“27.
  4. Vosloo J., Ostrow A., Watson J.C., 2009. The rela-tionships between motivational climate, goal orienta-tions, anxiety, and self-confidence among swimmers. J Sport Behav. 32, 374-396.
  5. Martens R., Vealey R.S., Burton D., 1990. Competitive anxiety in sport Champaign., Illinois: Human Kinetics. pp.117-173.
  6. Cox R.H., Martens M.P., Rusell W.D. 2003. Measuring anxiety in athletics: the Revised Com-petitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 25, 519-533.
  7. Terry P.C., Lane A.M., Shepherdson A., 2005. Re-evaluation of the factorial validity of the revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventoryââ‚‌“2. In Morris T, Terry P (Ed.), Promoting Health and Performance for Life: Proceedings of the ISSP 11th World Congress of Sport Psychology. Sydney: International Society of Sport Psychology. Retrieved from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/659/1/Terry.pdf.
  8. Lundqvist C, Hassmen P. 2005. Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2): Evaluating the Swedish version by confirmatory factor analyses. J Sport Sc. 23(7): 727-736.
  9. Andrade-Fernández E.M., Lois Río G., Arce Fernández C., 2007. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 with athletes. Psicothema. 19(1), 150-155.
  10. Raudsepp L., Kais K., 2008. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Revised Competitive State Snxiety Inventory-2 among Estonian athletes. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 6, 85 - 96.
  11. Martinent G., Ferrand C., Guillet E., Gautheur S., 2009. Validation of the French version of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 Revised (CSAI-2R) including frequency and direction scales. PsycholSport Exerc. In press, 1ââ‚‌“7.
  12. Fernandes M.G., Nunes S.A., Raposo J.V., Fer-nandes H.M., Brustad R., 2013. The CSAI-2: An Examination of the Instrument's Factorial Validity and Reliability of the Intensity, Direction and Frequency Dimensions with Brazilian Athletes. J Applied Sport Psychol. 25(4), 377-391.
  13. Pan-uthai S., Vongjaturapat N., 2009. Confirm factor analysis on State Anxiety of Thai university student athletes. Paper presented at: 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Exercise and Sports Science & 8th International Sports Science Conference 15th ââ‚‌“ 17th July., Malaysia.
  14. Hashim H.A., Zulkifli E.Z., 2010. Analysis of the factorial validity and reliability of the Malay version of
  15. the revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2.
  16. British J Sports Med. 44: i58-i59. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.078725.197.
  17. Tabachnick B.C., Fidell L.S. 2001. Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, Massachu-setts: Allyn & Bacon.
  18. Hu L., Bentler P.M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 6, 1-55.
  19. Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D., 1984. LISREL-VI user's guide.3rd ed. Mooresville. In: Scientific Software.
  20. Browne M.W., Cudeck R., 1993. Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen., J.S. Long, (eds). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: CA. pp.132-62.

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 14 July 2018
  • Receive Date: 25 January 2017
  • Revise Date: 16 January 2019
  • Accept Date: 29 October 2018