Occupational Health Risk Assessment of Iranian Drilling Industry

Authors

1 Department of Drilling Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Safety and Protection Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Abadan, Iran

Abstract

Drilling industry provides a significant potential for occupational health risks. Thus, health-related hazards (chemical, physical, ergonomic and biological) must be recognized, evaluated and controlled in order to prevent occupational illnesses which come from exposure to them. For these, a good occupational health risk assessment needs to be applied. Risk assessment monitors risks and provides guidance for decision-making. This project identifies all the occupational health risks and estimated risk levels. At last, the risk numbers are assessed their significance by the use of occupational health risk assessment techniques to minimize the risks. The main goal is to gain a level of risk protection which is acceptable with a good model. Therefore, the Occupational health risk assessment worksheet illustrates health hazards into four categories of every tasks of drilling industry. The risk categorized in the five levels and the high risks of Iranian drilling industry are those in the category of c.   

Keywords


  1. Su C., A GIS-supported environmental risk assessment approach for petroleum contaminated site, MASc thesis, The University of Regina: Canada, 2001.
  2. Spouge J., A Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment for Offshore Installations, CMPT, Patent 870,553,365, 1999.
  3. Marquez A.C., 2007. The Maintenance Management Framework Models and Methods for Complex Systems Maintenance, Springer-Verlag, London. Pp. 62-64.
  4. Junge A., 2010. Petroleum Refining: A 125 Year Kansas Legacy, Kansas Department of H. and Envir. June 30. Pp. 47-51.
  5. Ericson C.A., Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety. John Wiley & Sons. 2005.
  6. Kalantarnia M., Khan F., Hawboldt K., 2010. Modeling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach. Process Saf Env Prot. Pp. 191ââ‚‌“199.
  7. Krishnasamy L., Khan F., Haddara M., 2005. Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generating plant. Loss Prevent Prod. (18)2, 69-81.
  8. Khan F.I., Abbasi S.A., 1998. Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. Loss Prevent Prod. 11, 261ââ‚‌“277.
  9. Melnik E., Everitt B., Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment, Wiley, 2008.
  10. Reese C., Occupational Health and Safety management, Lewis, 2003.
  11. Satersdal L., Skeggs J., 2003. Health Risk Assessment and Health Monitoring, SPE, Offshore Euro., 2-5 September, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. Pp. 45-47.
  12. McHugh S., Maruca S.D., Manning A., 2006. Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA) Process, SPE, Inter H. Saf & Envir Conf. 2-4 April, Abu Dhabi. pp. 32-35.
  13. Zainuddin M.Z., Samad A.H., Irwan B., Hasyim I.B., Basuni H. Zampello F.C., 2002. Conducting Public Health Risk Assessment in a Remote Drilling
  14. Site in Indonesia. H. Saf and Envir in Oil and Gas Explor and Prod. 20-22 March, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pp. 21-27.
  15. Turoff M., Linstone H.A., the Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley Publ., 2002.