Assessment Bioremediation of Contaminated Soils to Petroleum Compounds and Role of Chemical Fertilizers in the Decomposition Process

Authors

1 Young Researchers & Elites Club, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of the Environment, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Today oil removal from contaminated soil by new methods such as bioremediation is necessary.  In this paper, the effect of chemical fertilizers and aeration on bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil has been investigated. Also the control group, (bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soil without treatment by chemical fertilizers and aeration treatment was examined. The condition of experiment is as following: those were treated 70 days in glass columns (30×30×30cm dimensions), ambient temperature (25-30 0C), relative humidity 70%, aeration operation with flow 0.7 lit/min.  The total number of heterotrophic bacteria of break down oil and the total of petroleum hydrocarbons were analyzed using gas chromatography analysis. all experiments were replicated three times. The microbial population results for control soil, treated soil by aeration and treated soil by aeration and chemical fertilizers columns are 2.3×105, 1.04×1010, and 1.14×1011 CFU/gr, respectively. The concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons of remaining are 46965, 38124, and 22187 mg kg-1respectively. The obtained results show that the aeration operation and chemical fertilizers have effective role on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon by oil degrading bacteria from soil.

Keywords


  1. Norris R. D., Hinchee R. E., Brown R. A.,
  2. McCarty P. L., Semprini L., Wilson J. T.,
  3. Kampbell D. H., Reinhard M., Bower E. J.,
  4. Borden R. C., Vogel T. M., Thomas J. M., Ward
  5. C. H., 1994. Handbook of Bioremediation. Boca
  6. Raton, FL:CRC Press.
  7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  8. (EPA).,1991. Soil Vapor Extraction Technology:
  9. Reference Handbook. Cincinnati, OH: Office of
  10. Research and Development. EPA/540/2-9.
  11. Frick C. M., Farrell R. E., Germida J. J., 1999.
  12. Assessment of Phytoremediation as an in situ
  13. technique for cleaning oil-contaminated sites,
  14. Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada, Calgary.
  15. Lundstedt S., 2003. Analysis of PAHs and their
  16. transformation products in contaminated soil and
  17. remedial processes, Solfjodern Offset AB, Umea,
  18. Sweden, pp: 55.
  19. Mills M. A., Bonner J. S., McDonald T. J., Paqe C.
  20. A., Autenrieth R. L., 2003. Intrinsic
  21. bioremediation of a petroleum impacted wetland.
  22. Marine Pollutin Bulletin, 46, pp 887-899.
  23. Chorom M., Sharifi H. S., Motamedi H., 2010.
  24. Bioremediation of a crude oil-polluted soil by
  25. application of fertilizers, Iran. J. Environ. Health.
  26. Sci. En, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp: 319-326.
  27. Prince R. C., Lessard R. R., Clark R. ,2003.
  28. Bioremediation of marine oil spills, Oil & Gas and
  29. Technology-Rev, 58 (4), 463-468.
  30. Mendelssohn I. A., Lin Q., 2003. Development of
  31. bioremediation for oil spill cleanup in costal
  32. wetland. OCS Study, MMS 2002-2048.
  33. Rittmann B. E., McCarty P. L., 2001.
  34. Enviromental Biotechnology: Principles and
  35. Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 695.
  36. Tang J., Niu X., Sun Q., Wang R., 2010.
  37. Bioremediation of Petroleum Polluted Soil by
  38. Combination of Ryegrass with Effective
  39. Microorganisms, Journal of Environmental
  40. Technology and Engineering, 3(2) : pp 80-86.
  41. Walworth J. L., Reynolds C. M., 1995.
  42. Bioremediation of a petroleum-contaminated cryic
  43. soil: effects of Phosphorous, nitrogen, and
  44. temperature. Journal of Soil Contam, 4:pp 299 -
  45. Facundo J., Marquez R., Hernandez V., Teresa
  46. Lamela M. A., 2000. Biodegraradation of diesel
  47. oil in soil by a microbial consortium, pp: 313-320.
  48. Milic J. S., Beskoski V. P., Ilic M.V., Ali S. M.,
  49. GojgicCvijovic G. D., Vrvic M. M.,
  50. Bioremediation of soil heavily contaminated
  51. with crude oil and its products: composition of the
  52. microbial consortium, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 74 (4):
  53. pp 455ââ‚‌“460.
  54. Osterreicher-Cunha P., Do Amaral Vargas Jr. E.,
  55. Remy Davee Guimaraes J., Mauro Pereira de
  56. Campos T., Maria Ferreira Nunes C., Costa A.,
  57. Dos Santos Antunes F., Isabel Pais da Silva M.,
  58. Maria Mano D., 2004. Evaluation of bioventing on
  59. a gasolineââ‚‌“ethanol contaminated undisturbed
  60. residual soil, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.
  61. , pp 64-66.
  62. Schaefer M., Juliane F., 2007. The influence of
  63. earthworms and organic additives on the
  64. biodegradation of oil contaminated soil. Applied
  65. Soil Ecoogy, 36, pp: 53-62.
  66. USDA., 1993. ââ‚‌œSoil Survey Manual, United States
  67. Department of Agricultureââ‚‌, USA.
  68. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical
  69. Chemists), 2005. Methods of Analysis.,
  70. Washington D.C.
  71. Klute A. (ed.)., 1986. Methods of Soil
  72. Analysis.Part 1, 2nd ed. American Society of
  73. Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America,
  74. Madison, WI.
  75. Wrenn B. A., Venosa A. D., 1996. ââ‚‌œSelective
  76. enumeration of aromatic and aliphatic
  77. hydrocarbon degrading bacteria by a mostprobable-
  78. number procedureââ‚‌. Canadian Journal of
  79. Microbiology: 42 (2) :pp252ââ‚‌“258.
  80. Gogoi B. K., Dutta N. N., Goswami P., Krishna
  81. Mohan T. R., 2003. A case study of
  82. bioremediation of petroleumhydrocarbon
  83. contaminated soil at a crude oil spill site.
  84. Advances in Environmental Research, 7: pp 767-
  85. Christopher S., Hein P., Marsden J., Shurleff A. S.,
  86. Evaluation of methods 3540 (soxhlet) and
  87. (Sonication) for evaluation of appendix IX
  88. analyses from solid samples. S-CUBED, Report
  89. for EPA contract 68-03-33-75, work assignment
  90. No.03, Document No. SSS-R-88-9436.
  91. U. S. EPA., 1984. Interalaboratory Comparison
  92. Stunt: Methods for volatile and semiââ‚‌“volatile
  93. compounds, Environmental monitoring systems
  94. laboratory. Office of Research and Development,
  95. Las Vegas, NV, EPA. 600/4- 84- 027.
  96. Kang W., Cheong J., Kim K., Chang J., 2011a.
  97. Remediation of TPH-Contaminated Soils in the
  98. Railroad Area by Using Soil Washing. Proc. Of
  99. Korea Society of Environmental Engineers., pp:
  100. -103.
  101. Kang W., Cheong J., Kim K., Chang J. Kim D.,
  102. b. Remediation of Petroleum-Contaminated
  103. Railroad Soils by Soil Washing. Proc. Of
  104. International Symposium on Mine reclamation.,
  105. pp: 160-161.
  106. Chungnam University, 2011.Verification report of
  107. soil remediation., pp: 8-9, 24-27.
  108. Margesin R., 2000. Potentiol of cold-adapted
  109. microorganisms for bioremediation of oil-polluted
  110. Alpine soils. International Biodeterioration &
  111. Biodegradation, 46:pp 3-10.
  112. Tajik M., 2004. Assessment of geoenvironmental
  113. effect of petroleum pollution on coastal sediments
  114. of Bushehr province. Iran.M.Sc. Thesis, tarbiat
  115. modares university, Tehran-Iran(in Persian) 97p.
  116. Ouyang W., Liu H., Murygina V., Yongyong Y.,
  117. Xiu Z., Kalyuzhnyi S. ,2005. Comparison of bioaugmentation
  118. and composting for remediation of
  119. oily sludge : A field-scale study in China. Process
  120. Biochemistry, 40: pp 3763-3768Prince,R.C. et al.,
  121. Bioremediationof oil spill. Oil & Gas and
  122. Technology-Rev, 58 (4), pp 463-468.
  123. Katsivela E., Moore E. R. B., Maroukli D.,
  124. Strompl C., Pieper D., Kalogerakis N., 2005.
  125. Bacterial community dynamics during in-situ
  126. bioremediation of petroleum waste sludge in
  127. landfarming sites. Biodegradation, 16: pp 169-180.