Home Articles List Article Information
Journal of Chemical Health Risks
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 9 (2019)
Volume Volume 8 (2018)
Volume Volume 7 (2017)
Volume Volume 6 (2016)
Volume Volume 5 (2015)
Volume Volume 4 (2014)
Volume Volume 3 (2013)
Volume Volume 2 (2012)
Volume Volume 1 (2011)
Yousefi, A., Bostani, A. (2012). Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration in Remediation of Oil-contaminated Soils with Use of Fenton Reaction. Journal of Chemical Health Risks, 2(4), -. doi: 10.22034/jchr.2018.544013
A. S. Yousefi; A. Bostani. "Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration in Remediation of Oil-contaminated Soils with Use of Fenton Reaction". Journal of Chemical Health Risks, 2, 4, 2012, -. doi: 10.22034/jchr.2018.544013
Yousefi, A., Bostani, A. (2012). 'Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration in Remediation of Oil-contaminated Soils with Use of Fenton Reaction', Journal of Chemical Health Risks, 2(4), pp. -. doi: 10.22034/jchr.2018.544013
Yousefi, A., Bostani, A. Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration in Remediation of Oil-contaminated Soils with Use of Fenton Reaction. Journal of Chemical Health Risks, 2012; 2(4): -. doi: 10.22034/jchr.2018.544013

Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration in Remediation of Oil-contaminated Soils with Use of Fenton Reaction

Article 8, Volume 2, Issue 4, Autumn 2012  XML PDF (498.85 K)
DOI: 10.22034/jchr.2018.544013
Authors
A. S. Yousefi email ; A. Bostani
Receive Date: 28 May 2013,  Revise Date: 12 December 2019,  Accept Date: 29 October 2018 
Abstract
Refining oil-contaminated soils has a great importance especially in oil producer countries such as Iran. Different methods have been provided to eliminate oil contaminations from soil. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Hydrogen peroxide concentration in refining oil-contaminated soils with Fenton chemical method. To do this, a calcareous soil complex sample was collected around the Tehran oil refinery and treated with 10 and 20 percent petroleum in three replications. After reaching to balance conditions, the sample was treated using0.01, 0.02,0.12,0.24,0.47 and 0.71 equivalent of Hydrogen peroxide. The results indicated that in all level of H2O2, the eliminating efficiency in 10 percent was more than 20 percent treatment. Also a significant difference between the levels of hydrogen peroxide used in the removal of oil pollution in both surface concentrations was obtained (P<0.01).
Keywords
Oil Contamination; Refining; Fenton reaction; hydrogen peroxide
References
  1. MinaieTehrani,D.Harphmanesh, .DehkordiAzari,
  2. F..Biodegradationofheavycrude petrolioumin the
  3. soilwith thePilot Scale.Journal ofEnvironmental
  4. Sciences, Winter 1384, 10,82-71
  5. Bautista, P., Mohedano, A.F., Casas, J.A., Zazo,
  6. J.A., Rodriguez, J.J., 2008. An overview of the
  7. application of Fenton oxidation to industrial
  8. wastewaters treatment. J. Chem. Technol.
  9. Biotechnol. 83, 1323ââ‚‌“1338.
  10. Di Palma, L., 2005. In situ chemical oxidation
  11. of environments combined with hazardous
  12. materials. In: Lens, P., Grotenhuis, T., Malina, G.,
  13. Tabak, H. (Eds.), Soil and Sediment Remediation:
  14. Mechanisms, Technologies and Applications.
  15. IWA Publishing, London, pp. 200ââ‚‌“222.
  16. Huang, C.P., Dong, C., Tang, Z., 1993.
  17. Advanced chemical oxidation: its present role and
  18. potential future hazard. Waste Manage. 13, 361ââ‚‌“
  20. ITRC (The Interstate Technology and
  21. Regulatory Council), 2005. Technical and
  22. Regulatory Guidance for In Situ Chemical
  23. Oxidation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater,
  24. second ed. ISCO. 2. Interstate Technology
  25. Council, In Situ Chemical Oxidation Team,
  26. Washington, DC. .
  27. Munter, R., 2001. Advanced oxidation
  28. processes-current status and prospects. Proc. Est.
  29. Acad. Sci. Chem. 50 (2), 59ââ‚‌“80.
  30. Pignatello, J.J., Oliveros, E., Mackay, A., 2006.
  31. Advanced oxidation processes for organic
  32. contaminant destruction based on the Fenton
  33. reaction and related chemistry. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci.
  34. Technol. 36, 1ââ‚‌“84
  35. Munter, R., 2001. Advanced oxidation
  36. processes-current status and prospects. Proc. Est.
  37. Acad. Sci. Chem. 50 (2), 59ââ‚‌“80.
  38. Schwab and Banks, K. 1999.
  39. Phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated
  40. soils. In Adriano, D.C, Bollag, J.-M.,
  41. Frankenberger, W.T. Jr and Sims, R.C. (Editors)
  42. Bioremediation of Contaminated
  43. Soils.Agronomy No. 37, American Society of
  44. Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America,
  45. Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison,
  46. Wisconsin, USA pp.783-795.
  47. Sung-HoKong, Richard J. Watts, Jin-Ho Choi,
  48. Treatment of Petroleum-Contaminated Soils Using
  49. Iron Mineral Catalyzed Hydrogen Peroxide,
  50. Chemosphere, Vol. 37, No. 8(1998) 1473-1482.
  51. Watts, R.J., Teel, A.L., 2005. Chemistry of
  52. modified Fentonââ‚‌™s reagent (catalyzed H2O2
  53. propagations -CHP) for in situ soil and
  54. groundwater remediation. J. Environ. Eng.
  55. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:4(612).
Statistics
Article View: 130
PDF Download: 76