Removal of Blue 56 by Orange Peel from the Waste Water

Authors

Department of Chemistry, Gachsaran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran, Iran

Abstract

The use of orange peel as low-cost and eco-friendly adsorbents has been investigated as an ideal alternative to the current expensive methods of removing dyes from wastewater. This paper concerns with the removal of Blue 56 from aqueous solutions by orange peel. The effects of pH, initial concentration, adsorbent dosage, and particle size of adsorbent, temperature and also isotherm data analysis and adsorption kinetics were investigated. A maximum removal of 96.76% was obtained at pH 2.5 for an adsorbent dose of 0.2 mg. Rate of adsorption was found to conform to pseudo-second-order kinetics with a good correlation (R2=0.99). The maximumadsorption capacity obtained from Langmuir equation was9.69 (mgg-1).

Keywords


Asfour. H. M., M. M. Nasser, O. A. Fadali and M. S.
El-Geundi, 1985. Colour removal from textile
effuents using hardwood sawdust as anadsorbent. J.
Technol. Biotechnol. (1985) 35: 28-34.
Deo N. and M. Ali, Dye adsorption by a new low cost
material congo red-1. Indian J. Environ. Prot.
(1993) 13: 496 ±508.
Dogan. M., M. Alkan and Y. Onganer, Adsorption of
methylene blue from aqueous solution onto
perlite,Water Air Soil Pollut. 120 (2000) 229ââ‚‌“249.
Freundlich H. M. F., Uber die adsorption in Iosungen,
Z. Phys. Chem. (Leipzig) 57A (1906) 385ââ‚‌“470.
Gupta G. S., G. Prasad and V. N. Singh, Removal of
chrome dye from aqueous solutions by mixed
adsorbents:fly ash and coal. Water Reseach (1990)
:45±50.
Ho Y.S., G. McKay, D. A. J. Wase and C. F. Foster,
Study of the sorption of divalent metal ions on to
peat, Adsorp. Sci. Technol. 18 (2000) 639ââ‚‌“650
Kinniburgh D. G., General purpose adsorption
isotherms, Environ. Sci. Technol. 20 (1986) 895ââ‚‌“
Lagergren S., Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption
geloster stoffe Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsaka
demiens , Handlingar 24 (1898) 1ââ‚‌“39.
Langmuir I., The constitution and fundamental
properties of solids and liquids, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1916) 2221ââ‚‌“2295.
Longhinott E., F. Pozza, L. Furlan, M. D. N. D.
Sanchez, M. Klug, M. C. M. Laranjeira and V. T.
Favere, Adsorption of anionic dyes on the
biopolymer chitin, J. Brazil. Chem.Soc. 9 (1998)
ââ‚‌“440.
Low K. S. and Lee C. K., The removal of cationic dyes
using coconuthusk as an adsorbent.Pertanika (1990)
:221±8.
Malik P. K., V. Meshko, L. Markovska, M. Mincheva
and A. E. Rodrigues, WaterRes. Dyes Pigments 56
(2003) 239ââ‚‌“249. 35 (2001) 3357ââ‚‌“3366.
McKay G. and J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 32
(1982) 759ââ‚‌“772.
Namasivayam C., D. Prabha and M. Kumutha,
Removal of dyes by adsorption on to agricultural
solid waste. BioresourceTechno(1997) 62:123±7.
Namasivayam C., R. Jayakumar and R. T. Yamuna
Dye removal fromwastewater by adsorption on
waste Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide.Waste Management
(1994) 4:643±8.
Namasivayam C. and K. Kadirvelu, Coirpith as an
agricultural wasteby-product, for the treatment of
dyeing wastewater. Bioresource Technol (1994)
:79±81.
Namasivayam C. and R. T., Yamuna Utilising bio gas
residual slurryfor dye adsorption. Amer Dye Stuâ‚Â‌
Rep (1994) 83:22±8.
Namasivayam C. and J. S. E. Arasi, Removal of
congored from waste water by adsorption on to
waste red mud. Chemosphere (1997) 34:401±17.
Nawar S. S. and H. S., Doma Removal of dyes from
e.uents using lowcost agricultural by products. The
Sci Tot Environ (1989) 79:271±9.
Nigam P., G. Armour, I. M. Banat, D. Singh and R.
Marchant, Bioresour.Technol. 72 (2000) 219ââ‚‌“226.
Ramakrishna K. R. and T. Viraraghavan, Water Sci.
Technol. 36 (1997)189ââ‚‌“196.
Robinson T., Chandran and P. Nigam, Water Res. 36
(2002) 2824ââ‚‌“2830.
Sanghi R. and B. Bhattacharya, Color Technol. 118
(2002) 256ââ‚‌“269.
Tsui L. S., W. R. Roy and M. A. Cole, Color Technol.
(2003) 14ââ‚‌“18