Determination of Mercury in Fish (Otollithes ruber) and Canned Tuna Fish Marketed in Khuzestan and Shiraz,

Authors

1 M.Sc, Food Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

2 Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

In this study mercury was determined in canned tuna fish produced and distributed in Iran after digestion by the standard methods of AOAC. Mercury contents in fish and canned tuna fish were determined by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The metal contents expressed in mg/kg wet weight for mercury varied from 0.017 to 0.394 (average of 0. 089) and 0.023 to 0.529 (average of 0.146) in fish and canned tuna fish, respectively. The values were comparable and in the range of with the literature valves. The results of this study indicate that fish and tuna fish of produced and marketed in Iran have concentrations well below the standards FAO/WHO levels of these toxic metals and only one tuna samples exceeded the European dietary limit of 0.5 mg Hg/kg.

Keywords

References

  1. Agusa, T., T. Kunito, G. Yasunga, H. Iwata, A.
  2. Subramanian, A. Ismail and S. Tanabe, 2005.
  3. Concentration of trace elements in marine fish
  4. and its risk assessment in Malaysia. Mar.
  5. Pollut. Bull., 51, 896-911.
  6. Andrée, S., W. Jira, K. H. Schwind, H. Wagner and
  7. F. Schwägele, 2010. Chemical safety of meat
  8. and meat products. Meat Sci., 86, 38ââ‚‌“48.
  9. Ashraf, W., Z. Seddigi, A. Abulkibash and M.
  10. Khalid, 2006. Levels of selected metals in
  11. canned fish consumed in Kingdom of Saudi
  12. Arabia. Environ. Monit. Assess., 117, 271-279.
  13. Ashraf, W. 2006. Levels of selected heavy metals
  14. in tuna fish. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 31, 89-92.
  15. Burger, J. and M. Gochfeld, 2005. Heavy metals in
  16. commercial fish in New Jersey. Environ. Res.,
  17. , 403ââ‚‌“412.
  18. Codex Committee on Food Additives and
  19. Contaminants, 2001. Comments submitted on
  20. draft maximum levels for lead and cadmium.
  21. Agenda 16c/16d, Joint FAO/WHO Food
  22. Standards Programme, Thirty-third Session,
  23. The Hague, The Netherlands, 12-16 March
  24. Commission of the European Communities, (2001).
  25. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 221/2002 of
  26. February 2002 amending regulation (EC)
  27. NO. 466/2002 setting maximum levels for
  28. certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official
  29. Journal of the European Commucities,
  30. Brussels, 6 February 2002.
  31. Committee for Inland Fisheries of Africa, 1992.
  32. Report of the third session of the working party
  33. on pollution and fisheries. FAO Fisheries
  34. Report No. 471. Food and Agriculture
  35. Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  36. De Marco, S.G., S.E. Botte and J.E.
  37. Marrcovecchio, 2006. Mercury distribution in
  38. biotic and biological compartments within
  39. several estuarine systems from Argentina,
  40. -2005 periods. Chemosphere, 65, 213-
  41. Emami Khansari, F., M. Ghazi-Khansari and M.
  42. Abdollahi, 2005. Heavy metals content of
  43. canned tuna fish. Food Chem., 93, 293-296.
  44. Food and Drug Administration, 2004. Mercury
  45. levels in commercial fish and shellfish.
  46. Available: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/_frf/seamehg.
  47. html. (accessed 5 January 2005).
  48. Guallar, E., M. I. Sanz-Gallardo, P. vanââ‚‌™t Veer, P.
  49. Bode, A. Aro, J. Gomez-Aracena, J. D. Kark,
  50. R. A. Riemersma, J. M. Martín-Moreno and F.
  51. J. Kok, 2002. Heavy metals and Myocardial
  52. Infarction Study Group: mercury, fish oils, and
  53. the risk of myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J.
  54. Med., 347(22),1747−1754.
  55. Hajeb, P., S. Jinap, A. Ismail, A.B. Fatimah, B.
  56. Jamilah and M. Abdul Rahim, 2009.
  57. Assessment of mercury level in commonly
  58. consumed marine fishes in Malaysia. Food
  59. Control, 20, 79-84.
  60. Hamilton, M.A., P.W. Rode, M.E. Merchant and J.
  61. Sneddon, 2008. Determination and comparison
  62. of heavy metals in selected seafood, water,
  63. vegetation and sediments by inductively
  64. coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry
  65. from an industrialized and pristine waterway in
  66. Southwest Louisiana. Microchemical J., 88,
  67. ââ‚‌“55.
  68. Hightower, J.M. and D. Moore, 2003. Mercury
  69. levels in high-end consumers of fish. Environ.
  70. Health Persp., 111, 604ââ‚‌“608.
  71. Hites, R.A., J.A. Foran, D.O. Carpenter, M.C.
  72. Hamilton, B.A. Knuth, and S.J. Schwager,
  73. Global assessment of organic
  74. contaminants in farmed salmon. Science, 303,
  75. ââ‚‌“229.
  76. Houseuova, P., V. Kuban, S. Kracmar and J. Sitko,
  77. Total mercury and mercury species in
  78. birds and fish in an aquatic ecosystem in the
  79. Czech Republic. Environ. Poll., 145,185-192.
  80. Ikem, A. and N.O. Egiebor, 2005. Assessment of
  81. trace elements in canned fishes (Mackerel,
  82. Tuna, Salmon, Sardines and Herrings)
  83. marketed in Georgia and Alabama (United
  84. States of America). J. Food Comp. Anal.,
  85. ,771-787.
  86. Kagi, J.H. and A. Schaffer, 1998. Biochemistry of
  87. metallothionein. Biochemistry, 27, 8509-8515.
  88. Rice, G., J. Swartout, K. Mahaffey and R.
  89. Schoeny, 2000. Derivation of US EPSââ‚‌™s oral
  90. Reference Dose (RfD) for methylmercury.
  91. Drug Chem. Toxicol., 23, 41ââ‚‌“54.
  92. Porto, J.I.R., C.S.O. Araujo and E. Feldberga,
  93. Mutagenic effects of mercury pollution
  94. as revealed by micronucleus test on three
  95. Amazonian fish species. Environ. Res., 97,
  96. -292.
  97. Rahimi, E., M. Hajisalehi, H.R. Kazemeini, A.
  98. Chakeri, A. Khodabakhsh, M. Derakhshesh,
  99. M. Mirdamadi, A.G. Ebadi, S.A. Rezvani and
  100. M. Fallah Kashkahi, 2010. Analysis and
  101. determination of mercury, cadmium and lead
  102. in canned tuna fish marketed in Iran. Afr. J.
  103. Biotechnol., 9(31), 4938-4941.
  104. Soegiantoa, A. and M. Hamami, 2007, Trace Metal
  105. Concentrations in Shrimp and Fish Collected
  106. from Gresik Coastal Waters, Indonesia. Sci.
  107. Asia, 33, 235-238.
  108. Storelli, M.M., R. Giacominelli-Stuffler and G.O.
  109. Marrcotrigiano, 2002. Total and
  110. methylmercury residues in cartilaginous fish
  111. from Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Poll. Bull., 44,
  112. -1358.
  113. Suppin, D., R. Zahlbruckner, C.H. Krapfenbauer-
  114. Cermak, C.H. Hassan-Hauser and F.J.M.
  115. Smulders, 2005. Mercury, lead and cadmium
  116. content of fresh and canned fish collected from
  117. Austrian retail operations. Nutrition, 29, 456-
  118. Tuzen, M. and M. Soylak, 2007. Determination of
  119. trace metals in canned fish marketed in
  120. Turkey. Food Chem., 101, 1378-1382.
  121. Tucker, B.W., 1997. Overview of current seafood
  122. nutritional issues: Formation of potentially
  123. toxic products. In: Shahidi F, Jones Y, Kitts
  124. DD, editors. Seafood safety, processing and
  125. biotechnology. Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.
  126. p. 5-10.
  127. Voegborlo, R.B., A.M. El-Methnani and M.Z.
  128. Abedin, 1999. Mercury, cadmium and lead
  129. content of canned tuna fish. Food Chem.,
  130. :341-345

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 March 2012
  • Revise Date: 17 May 2022
  • Accept Date: 29 October 2018
  • First Publish Date: 29 October 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics